Monday, June 24, 2019

Police Encounters with Suspects and Evidence Essay

epitome and application jurisprudence encounters with suspects and secern CJ227-08 felonious procedure unit 2 compendium and application constabulary encounters with suspects and evidence 1. Didofficermetalworkerhavereasonablesuspiciontomaketheinitialstopofthisvehicle?OfficerSmithhadreasonablesuspicionwhichisbasedonthetotalityofthecircumstancesasunderstoodbythoseversedinthefieldoflawenforcementitiscommonlydescribedassomethingmorethanahunchbutlessthanprobablecause. (test law)Theanswerisyes,OfficerSmithdidhavereasonablesuspiciontomaketheinitialstopofthevehicle. Because thetaillightappearedtobebrokenwhichisatrafficlawviolation.AlsoofficerSmithrememberedavehiclethatmatchedthegeneraldescriptionofthecarthathestopped. Thiscarfitthedescriptionofthevehiclethatwassuspectedinarecentroadsidekillingofanotherpoliceofficer. 2. Was the pat-down of the number one wood legal? Anofficermayorderamotoristoutofacartoensuretheofficerssafety. (quiz law)Thepoliceofficermayconductapat-downsearchtoensu retherearenoweapons. quiz law)Thepat-downisaquicksearchofapersonsbeinginordertodetermineifanyweaponsarepresent. Officer Smithspat-downwaslegalbecauseitwasnecessarytoensurehissafety. Insteadofprovidingherlicenseandregistration,thedriverspeedsawaywhichresultedinahighspeedchase. Thisisacircumstancethatwouldcauseareasonablepersontobelievethatentry(orotherrelevantpromptaction)wasnecessarytopreventphysicalharmtotheofficersorotherpersons. (Thelectriclawlibrary,1995-2011)Thissituationdoesfallunderexigentcircumstancebecausethereisimminentdanger,destruction,andthesuspectistryingtoescape. (quiz law) 4. Was the gun in plain peck and legally obtained?Plain-viewdoctrinetherulepermittingapoliceofficerswarrantlessseizureanduseasevidenceofanitemobservedinplainviewfromalawfulpositionorduringalegalsearchwhentheitemisevidenceofacrime. Todetermineiftheplainviewdoctrineapplies,policemustconsideranumberofvalidationsoneisduetoexigentcircumstances,whichOfficerSmithsfindingthegunfallsunder. (quiz law)Plainv iewdidapplytoOfficerSmithfindingthegunintheopenglovecompartmentandislawful.Thegunwasdiscoveredinadvertently,OfficerSmithhadlawfulaccesstotheplacefromwhichtheguncouldbeplainlyseen. Inadvertentdiscoveryalaw-enforcementofficersunexpectedfindingofincriminatingevidenceinplainview. 5. pass on the marijuana baggie be admissible evidence? Whenapersonisunabletogiveconsentduetounconsciousness, theofficercansearchthepurseorwalletofthesuspecttogettheirI. D. ,itscalledimpliedconsent.ThewomangaveOfficer SmithprobablecausetoconductafullsearchwhenshefledfromOfficerSmithwhenhepulledheroverforthetaillight. OfficerSmithwillbeabletousethemarijuanabaggieasevidence. WhilelookingfortheunconsciouswomansI. D. ,OfficerSmithfoundabaggieofmarijuanainherpurse. SincethewomanfledandwreckedthecarOfficerSmithhasprobablecauseandthemarijuanabaggiecanusedasevidence.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.